The universe seems a lot less daunting when we believe that these most disturbing alterations to our present norms are just science fiction. Whether it is a natural disposition to think the future will be like the present as Peter Diamandis and others happen to believe , or a head-in-the-sand perspective to preserve our sense of comfort, it would seem more responsible to instead seek a more truthful perspective from which to handle our future head-on.
It is a future that is today being guided and facilitated by our own impetus toward the ideal, by the same visionary force and primal desires that brought our human race to where it stands today. It was human questing for the ideal that took man from horse and carriage to motorcars; that brought us cellular phones, email, heart transplants, freedom of religion, freedom in choosing a mate, and so many other societal and technological shifts.
When technologies become available to literally alter human sentience, or create beyond-human general intelligence from silicon, will we be prepared for the consequences?
Our desire for the ideal is bringing us now towards arguably better — and almost certainly more efficient — modes of… everything. As a result, we see the Hyperloop, Google Glass, replacement brain parts, medication to safely influence emotion, and life extension research. Which will become realities, how they manifest in our societies, and when… is all for time to tell — and our innovators and policymakers to determine. The difference between motorcars and replacement brain parts, or a moon landing and a human-level artificial intelligence, may simply be the era in which we live, and our level of technological development.
It may well be that a moon landing was a more god-like feat than our eventual creation of post-human intelligence. There is no certainty whatsoever about which technologies will develop first, or how — but there should be certainty about our responsibility to steward them into reality in a careful way towards what we believe to be an aggregately beneficial future. I argue that there is no more important task than exactly this stewardship, and so I have dedicated my life to fostering the global conversation that might make this kind of human solidarity and future-building possible read: The Cause.
When Benjamin Walt went under the knife to treat severe depression by having electrodes implanted inside his skull — the ideal was to feel better. When Cathy Hutchinson had a stroke and was left mentally sharp but trapped in a body incapable of movement or speech, she aimed to do whatever it took to interact with her world and loved ones again.
She opted to have a device implanted in her motor cortex to allow her to drive a wheelchair, control a computer mouse on a screen, and even bring a cup to her mouth to drink with a robotic arm — all using the power of her thoughts alone.
Our sense of the ideal drives action and creates the future from our imagination. If Benjamin believed that a happier day-to-day life was more important than preserving a body unencumbered by machine parts, then making the choice for brain stimulation was an obvious one.
This brings us to a potentially troubling perspective on our condition — a perspective which also happens to be a requirement for our honest, vigilant, and open-minded transition to a future:. Our momentum and technologies are taking us not just to fancier, smaller, more capable gadgets… we are moving to an entirely new human condition within our lifetime. The urgency of our present condition comes not only from the gravity of the situation on the whole — but from the speed of its approach.
We need to be taking the steps now to understand the ramifications and implications of the technologies that will shape humanity, and guide this transition with caution and with collaboration.
Our unfortunate tendency is to ignore or brush off notions which prove too different from our present condition — but a blind eye turned to the real possibilities of these major trends and trajectories is a blind eye turned to the human future. Kodak was put out of business by its underestimating digital photography. What needs to be considered when 3-D printers can produce everything from guns to human organs? What would we need to plan for in considering memory or intelligence augmentations to our very brains?
Our own technological explosion will not necessarily lead to being boiled alive like the frog, unless we, too, lack an appropriate understanding—and therefore an appropriate response to our conditions and also ignore the constant, incremental changes that shift our predicament. The only thing worse than a frog boiled alive out of poor perception is an ostrich with its head in the sand, willful ignoring real concern — or acting on cowardice.
This is not a task merely for scientists, for philosophers, for businessmen, or for governments, but for all of society. The time to unite our efforts is now — when we hold the responsibility not just as providers for our next generation, but as stewards of consciousness and intelligence itself.
This collaboration, then, is not just geared towards discovering technologies but discovering the best ways to introduce and implement them as we swing forward into a transformative new era. Will we ignore any deviance from our own perceived norms and miss out on guiding the course of the greatest changes that have ever tested humankind?
It seems clear that through the whole of nature, there has been a kind of bumbling forward — a series of accidents leading to a series of new combinations — leading to new forms and new situations:. Early human ancestors painting a bison inside a cave during the Paleolithic Age. During this era, early humans shared the planet with a number of now-extinct hominin relatives, including Neanderthals and Denisovans.
In the Paleolithic period roughly 2. They used basic stone and bone tools, as well as crude stone axes, for hunting birds and wild animals. They cooked their prey, including woolly mammoths, deer and bison, using controlled fire. They also fished and collected berries, fruit and nuts. Ancient humans in the Paleolithic period were also the first to leave behind art. They used combinations of minerals, ochres, burnt bone meal and charcoal mixed into water, blood, animal fats and tree saps to etch humans, animals and signs.
They also carved small figurines from stones, clay, bones and antlers. The end of this period marked the end of the last Ice Age , which resulted in the extinction of many large mammals and rising sea levels and climate change that eventually caused man to migrate. They get their name from the distinctive mounds middens of shells and other kitchen debris they left behind. During the Mesolithic period about 10, B. They often lived nomadically in camps near rivers and other bodies of water.
I am 10 years old and I live in Istanbul, Turkey. I want to write about myself so you know what I look like. I am not very short and not very tall. I am medium height. I have long, straight hair. It is black. I have brown eyes. My best friend is Eda. She is 15 years old. She lives in Istanbul, too. She is very tall. She has short, straight hair. She has fair hair and she has blue eyes. Her face is long — oval shape.
Her legs are also very long. I always go out with her. We love to go out together. Have you got short hair or long hair?
Have you got blue eyes? Please write me! Yours, Pelin. This is a picture quiz about body parts. Select the correct option from the list that corresponds to the image. This is a listening evaluation about body parts. In this test first of all listen to the word by clicking the play button. Then select the relevant picture from the list. Each correct answer will add 10 points to your score. Test your vocabulary writing ability here.
Then write the name of the image into the text box. This is a listening and spelling test about body parts.
0コメント